A more likely prospect is that we are coming to the end of a very unusual period when yields were pushed temporarily to levels that are unsustainable from any longer-term perspective: Fitch Ratings, for example, estimates there are currently some USD 9 trillion of government bonds that offer negative yields. As a result, prices were driven up to very expensive levels.
It may be a slow and volatile process, but it looks as if this period of ultralow yields is beginning to reverse. The US is clearly in the vanguard with higher rates and an unwinding of bond-buying support, but it is also beginning to happen elsewhere. In June, for example, there was an unexpectedly tight vote (5 to 3) at the Bank of England’s latest policy meeting to keep interest rates unchanged: The minority had wanted to start raising rates now. In the eurozone, the European Central Bank has said that it will not ease any further, although it has yet to get to the point where it will actually start raising rates or cutting back on its bond buying programme. Only in Japan is there is still the prospect of monetary policy being maintained on an ultra-easy setting. In sum, barring some geopolitical or financial shock that might resurrect safe-haven buying, the economic outlook is not favourable to bonds. 

International Equities — Outlook

In the past couple of weeks, we have seen two major reports on the outlook for the world economy. They came to much the same conclusion: The immediate cyclical outlook is reasonably good, though not outright strong.

First cab off the rank was the World Bank. Its latest Global Economic Prospects report, while subtitled "A Fragile Recovery," nonetheless expects the world economy to grow by 2.7% this year, a bit faster than the 2.4% achieved in 2016, and to pick up a little more steam in 2018 (growth of 2.9%) and 2019 (again 2.9%). Growth prospects are somewhat lopsided by region, with the developed economies likely to grow by only 1.8% next year compared with the 4.5% expected for the developing and emerging economies (mostly owing to expected 7.5% growth in India and 6.3% growth in China). The "fragility" bit comes from the report’s assessment that “the balance of risks remains tilted to the downside, although slightly less so than at the start of the year.” It said that “Increased protectionism, persistent policy uncertainty, geopolitical risks, or renewed financial market turbulence could derail an incipient recovery.”

The OECD’s latest update of its Economic Outlook was somewhat more upbeat. Its world growth numbers are a bit higher: 3.0% for last year, 3.5% for this year, and 3.6% next year, and like the World Bank it has the developed world growing more slowly this year (2.1%) than the developing world (4.6%, once again with India and China at the forefront). And it can even see the possibility of some positive surprises: “There are upside risks to the projections for investment, trade, and productivity. Evidence from business surveys and from data suggests that the ageing of the capital stock may spur investment in higher-quality capital with more advanced technology,” with assorted positive side effects.

But it, too, worried about much the same set of risks as the World Bank—“Geopolitical shocks and trade protectionism could catalyse snapbacks in asset prices and realise downside risks through a variety of channels”—and the OECD appeared especially concerned about risks from the financial markets, where both bond and equity prices are unusually high. It said that “Big corrections in various asset prices would weigh on economic activity” through a variety of channels.

The latest (June) monthly survey of international fund managers run by Bank of America Merrill Lynch showed that the managers strongly believe global equities are overvalued. A record net 44% of them were of that view (a "net 44%" result being what you get, for example, when 67% subscribe to the expensive view while 33% do not). They saw the US market as especially dear, with a remarkable net 84% (that is, virtually everyone) picking it as the most expensive market in the world; the tech sector in particular was seen as pricey. The fund managers rated investing in the tech-heavy Nasdaq market as currently the most "crowded" investing strategy, where the weight of money herding into the market has most distorted the value on offer.

Despite these views, the fund managers continue to have overweightings in equities, though with pronounced regional variations: heavily underweight in the US and well underweight in the UK, neutral in Japan, and overweight everywhere else, particularly the eurozone (where France and Germany are the top picks) and the emerging markets.

The reason for the overweighting to equities, despite their priciness, is high expectations for global profits growth. If all goes well, for example, along the lines the World Bank expects, then high valuations may well prove justified. But equally, as the BAML commentary said, “Market vulnerability to profit weakness is very high.” The survey asks managers what risks they are most worried about that might derail their optimistic expectations. This time round, the answers were (in descending order) a wheel coming off in China, a crash in global bond markets—the managers believe monetary policy is now too stimulative and interest rates will need to rise, hence the risks to bonds—and prolonged inability to enact US corporate tax reforms (which may be a proxy for a wider concern about US' economic policy direction).

All going well, world equities may continue to grind out further gains, but it is against a background of potential risks that investors continue to undervalue: The VIX index of expected equity volatility in the US, often used as "fear gauge," remains at historically low levels.

Performance periods unless otherwise stated generally refer to periods ended Jun 16, 2017

©2017晨星有限公司。版權所有。晨星提供的資料：(1)為晨星及(或)其內容供應商的獨有資產；(2)未經許可不得複製或轉載；(3)純屬研究性質而非任何投資建議；及(4)晨星未就所載資料的完整性、準確性及即時性作出任何保證。晨星及其內容供應商對於因使用相關資料而作出的交易決定均不承擔任何責任。過往績效紀錄不能保證未來投資結果。本報告僅供參考之用，並不涉及協助推廣銷售任何投資產品。